Legal Opinion · Concurrence

General Motors Corp. v. Stokes Chevrolet

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 2003No. 1021446Published

1Concurrence

I do not find GM's argument in this case inconsistent with its argument in General Motors Corp. v. Stokes, 850 So.2d 1239 (Ala. 2002).

However, I would affirm the judgment of the trial court. This case is the mirror image of Cavalier Mfg., Inc. v. Clarke,862 So.2d 634 (Ala. 2003). The relocation agreement provides: "This Agreement will survive the execution of the Dealer Agreement, permitting Dealer to conduct Dealership Operations at the Property. . . ." The Oldsmobile dealer agreement the parties executed approximately six months after the relocation agreement provides, in pertinent part:

"Exc…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. CMI International, Inc. v. Intermet International Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Cavalier Mfg., Inc. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. General Motors Corp. v. StokesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API