Legal Opinion

Pineda v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 18, 2009No. 4D07-5006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Carmen Pineda, appeals her convictions for both organized scheme to defraud and grand theft. She argues on appeal that because the offenses were based upon common allegations, her conviction for both is a double jeopardy violation.

All the elements of the crime of theft are included within the offense of organized fraud. Louberti v. State, 895 So.2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Therefore, a defendant cannot be convicted of both crimes without a double jeopardy violation.

We find, and the state concedes, that the dual conviction is a double jeopardy violation. We therefore reverse and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pizzo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Louberti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beamon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Newton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Francois v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API