Moody v. Moody
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, O.
Only one proposition is presented and urged for reversal of the judgment entered by the trial court, and that is the general proposition that the court erred in decreeing that the plaintiff have and recover out of the separate property of the defendant the sum of $873.
After a careful reading of the entire testimony preserved in the record in this case, and eliminating all immaterial matters, the material facts disclosed are in substancte these:
Defendant was a widow having a son about 16 years old and her father living with her. She owned 195 acres of land which was free…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bruce v. BruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Allred v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Hughes v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- McAdoo v. McAdooSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929