Legal Opinion
Veal v. Rauch
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1988No. 88-CA-439PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOTHARD, Judge.
The defendant husband appeals from a judgment rejecting his set-off demand against past due alimony pendente lite. We affirm.
Mr. and Mrs. Lothar Karl Rauch married on December 31, 1978 and prior to their separation lived in Kenner, Louisiana. The parties separated on December 10, 1984. Immediately prior to leaving home, Mrs. Rauch withdrew $5,000 from the couple’s banking account and made credit card purchases of $2,700 for an airline ticket, luggage and clothes.
On December 14,1984 Mrs. Rauch filed a petition for separation and sought alimony in a rule which was tried on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hartley v. HartleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Cumpton v. CumptonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Nelson v. NelsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Castille v. CastilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Thomas v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A Confidential Limousine Service, Inc. v. London Livery, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Cabral v. WardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992