Legal Opinion
State v. FERDINAND R.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 20, 2011No. AC 31878PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ESPINOSA, J.
The defendant, Ferdinand R., appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of sexual assault in a spousal relationship in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70b (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence at trial was insufficient to convict him and (2) the court erroneously admitted certain uncharged misconduct evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. After a few weeks of dating, the defendant married the victim on April 13, 2007. A justice of the peace…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Fagan v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BattleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. FERDINAND R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012