Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Bank of Dover

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 12, 1948No. 4-8476PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellee has moved for affirmance of the judgment appealed from on the ground that appellant has failed to comply with Buie 9 of this court. This rule requires that in each case the appellant make an abstract of material portions of the “pleadings-, proceedings, facts and documents upon which appellant relies, . . . ”

In the case at bar no abstract was made of the complaint, it being thus referred to in appellant’s brief: ‘ ‘ Complaint was filed in this case, wherein, the usual allegations were made on February 20, 1946.” Only this reference to the answer is made: “Answer was filed by the Bank…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Golden v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Droke v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barrett v. Fort Smith Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API