Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Prince George's County
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 20, 1972No. [No. 176, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.
The aim of the appellants, landowners in Prince George’s County, in filing a bill for declaratory and incidental injunctive relief was to avoid reconsideration by the District Council of Prince George’s County of its grant of a special exception and a variance which would enable appellants to use their land for a filling and automobile repair station. Judge Bowie said that although he was “of the belief that declaratory relief can obtain in certain instances, despite a failure to exhaust administrative remedies,” he felt no need to decide if this case presented one of these instances since he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tanner v. McKeldinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Poe v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Ellicott v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Albert v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Gingell v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Soley v. State Commission on Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Insurance Commissioner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Holiday Point Marina Partners v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.