Legal Opinion

In Re West

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This is a proceeding'for contempt of this court arising out of the failure of West, without legal excuse, to obey the subpoena of this court.

West, a lawyer of Bolivar, was charged with wrongfully and unlawfully retaining funds of a client before the Advisory Committee of our Bar Administration. The committee set a formal hearing of these charges. A subpoena duces tecum to appear at this hearing was issued by this court and was duly served on West. He refused to answer the subpoena and failed to appear. The committee has reported his disobedience to this court as it is required to do under…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Thompson v. Farmers Exchange BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Ex Parte Arvin v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. KoonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  2. State Ex Rel. Howard v. AllisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State v. BurnettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. State v. NorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. White v. HeldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API