Legal Opinion · Concurrence

First Bank & Trust v. Treme

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 2013No. 13-CA-168PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceWicker, J.

| T Although I agree with the result reached by the majority, I write separately to respectfully express my own reasoning.

In the proceedings below, Mr. Treme asserted various claims against the Bank, First Bank CDC, and Mr. Canizaro. In this appeal, Mr. Treme only argues the trial court erred in entering its judgment in favor of Mr. Canizaro on Mr. Treme’s intentional interference claims.

Mr. Treme claims that Mr. Canizaro intentionally interfered with contracts for both The Renovation Project and the Al-bertson’s Site. These contracts were between both Mr. Treme and the Bank, and Mr. Treme…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. SpurneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Riddle v. SimmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Glass v. Berkshire DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Bank & Trust v. TremeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API