Kipperman v. Berg (In re Berg)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION HOLDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS IN ABEYANCE PENDING TRIAL OF DISPUTED FACTS
CHRISTOPHER B. LATHAM, JUDGE United States Bankruptcy Court
■ The court finds that it may appropriately hold a summary judgment motion in abeyance pending resolution of disputed facts at an evidentiary hearing.
I. Procedural Background
A. The Main Bankruptcy Case
Debtors Neis Louis and Rachael Ann Berg filed a voluntary Chapter 7 petition in 2009. Richard Kipperman was appointed as the Chapter 7 Trustee. Neis and *164Rachael1 received their 11 U.S.C. § 727 discharge in 2012.
B. The Adversary Proceeding and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- City Of Los Angeles, Harbor Division, A Municipal Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant v. Santa Monica BaykeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Larry Melancon v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.