Legal Opinion

Kipperman v. Berg (In re Berg)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California

Decided June 17, 2015No. Bankruptcy Case No. 09-17553-CL7; Adversary Proceeding No. 13-90174-CLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION HOLDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS IN ABEYANCE PENDING TRIAL OF DISPUTED FACTS

CHRISTOPHER B. LATHAM, JUDGE United States Bankruptcy Court

■ The court finds that it may appropriately hold a summary judgment motion in abeyance pending resolution of disputed facts at an evidentiary hearing.

I. Procedural Background

A. The Main Bankruptcy Case

Debtors Neis Louis and Rachael Ann Berg filed a voluntary Chapter 7 petition in 2009. Richard Kipperman was appointed as the Chapter 7 Trustee. Neis and *164Rachael1 received their 11 U.S.C. § 727 discharge in 2012.

B. The Adversary Proceeding and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. City Of Los Angeles, Harbor Division, A Municipal Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant v. Santa Monica BaykeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Larry Melancon v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API