Legal Opinion

Farnell v. Brady

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 21, 1924No. 4425PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the general and special demurrers to the petition.

2. “He who would have equity must do equity and give effect to all equitable rights in the other party respecting the subject-matter of the suit.” • Civil Code (1910), § 4521. Accordingly, as a general rule, a *210petition to a court of equity to cancel a contract representing the sale of property, where there is no return or offer to return the consideration, is demurrable. An exception to the general rule stated above is that “a party is not obliged to return that which he is entitled to retain,” as alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ColleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Collier v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Mann v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Corbitt v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Nelson v. EstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Biggers v. Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API