Trammell v. McDade
Texas Supreme Court
¡Nothing was furnished to the Reporter hut the opinion. That does not indicate the county from which the appeal came, nor before whom the cause was tried The facts are sufficiently indicated in the opinion for all practical purposes. An application was made to the clerk for the record, but he could not find it.
1Opinion of the CourtDonley, J.
The first assignment of error is, that “ the court erred in excluding the evidence offered by the plaintiffs, which will appear by bill of exception.” This assignment is believed to refer to the depositions of John ¡R. White. The first deposition of the witness appears to have been taken by Briggs, a notary public, and was properly excluded on the objection. It does not appear from the *361certificate of the .officer that the witness swore to and subscribed the deposition. The second deposition of the witness was objected to because the interrogatories were leading. The objection, we think, was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seldon v. HickockNew York Supreme Court · 1804
- Roy v. BremondTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Tubbs v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tignor v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Sabine & East Texas Railway Co. v. BrousardTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Barnard v. TarletonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Arrington v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Green v. John Dallahan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1881
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.