Legal Opinion
Colorado River Indian Tribes v. Marsh
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 20, 1985No. CV 82-5017-RMT(JRx)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TAKASUGI, District Judge.
The Colorado River Indian Tribes (“Tribes”) and the Sierra Club (jointly “plaintiffs”) have filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief and petition for writ of mandamus against the heads of a number of federal agencies (collectively “Federal Defendants”), heads of state agencies, and River City Development Co. (“Developer”) (jointly “defendants”). The prayer seeks a declaration that the defendants have acted in violation of the first amendment rights of the members of the Tribes; an injunction enjoining the Army Corps of Engineers…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- California v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Scientists' Institute for Public Information, Inc. v. Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co., a Corporation v. Itt Continental Baking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Apache Survival Coalition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Montana Wilderness Ass'n v. FryDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2004
- National Trust for Historic Preservation v. BlanckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Border Power Plant Working Group v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2003
- Sylvester v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.