Legal Opinion

People v. Palmisano

New York Magistrate Court

Decided May 29, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRitdich, J.

The defendant, with two others, is charged with the crime of conspiracy in that the three conspired to defraud the complainant of the sum of $250. It is asserted that one of the three conspirators hired an automobile from Hertz Drive-Ur-Self-Stations, a corporation, under an arrangement by which the corporation was to indemnify the operator of the car against claims for damages for injuries sustained by third persons as a result of the use of the car; that a fraudulent claim for damages was reported to the corporation; that thereafter the claim was settled for $250, which was paid to this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Commonwealth v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. State v. SetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  4. Commonwealth v. KingsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. People v. RobertsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. TavorminaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. People v. BurnsNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API