Stinchcomb v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.
In writing this opinion we find sustenance in the aphorism that, “No will has a twin brother,” 1 and hence the improbability that we shall soon again encounter a testamentary document of similar import.
Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company (Mercantile), one of the appellees, as Substituted Trustee under the will of Frederick Schoenherr, deceased, filed a bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City for the construction of his will. This required the joining as defendants the remaindermen of the trust created by *484items second through eleventh of the will. Among the defendants…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Phelps v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Edgerly v. BarkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
- Hiber v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Smith v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- In Re Trust Under Will of CosgraveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.