Legal Opinion

Stinchcomb v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 3, 1970No. 226Published

1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.

In writing this opinion we find sustenance in the aphorism that, “No will has a twin brother,” 1 and hence the improbability that we shall soon again encounter a testamentary document of similar import.

Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company (Mercantile), one of the appellees, as Substituted Trustee under the will of Frederick Schoenherr, deceased, filed a bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City for the construction of his will. This required the joining as defendants the remaindermen of the trust created by *484items second through eleventh of the will. Among the defendants…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Phelps v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Edgerly v. BarkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
  3. Hiber v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Smith v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  5. In Re Trust Under Will of CosgraveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API