Legal Opinion

Kincannon v. State Compensation Commissioner

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1929No. 6596PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, President:

Charles Kincannon, who has received compensation on the basis of a fifty per cent, disability from the Workmen’s Compensation Fund, appeals from the action of the Commissioner refusing to re-open his claim for additional compensation.

From the record before us, it would seem that the claimant is totally disabled; yet the two Commissioners who have had this case before them have consistently maintained that a further consideration of the claim was barred by reason of a certain writing, executed by claimant over two years ago, purporting to release and discharge the Workmen’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McVey v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Jenkins v. HeaberlinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Sole v. KindelbergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Walker v. State Compansation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. State Compensation DirectorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Walk v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Morris v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Burgees v. Comp. Com'r.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Johnson v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API