Legal Opinion

Smithies v. Notley

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1915No. 828PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Exceptions from Circuit Court, Eirst Circuit. Hon. W. J. Robinson, Judge.

1Per curiam

Exceptions by plaintiff in an action of indebitatus assumpsit to recover on three certain promissory notes made by the. defendant, Notley, in favor of the Bank of Hawaii, Limited, and by the said Bank of Hawaii, Limited, endorsed to the plaintiff. The only exception set forth in the bill is one to the ruling and order of the trial court discharging the garnishees, William Henry, trustee of David E. Notley, and William T. Rawlins, based on the ground that said ruling and order was contrary to the law and the evidence and the weight of the evidence and the disclosures made upon oath by said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keliiilihune v. VierraHawaii Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Kalamakee ex rel. Keiki v. WhartonHawaii Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ah Chu v. Sung Kwong Wo Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ikalia v. KopaeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Kaleialii v. KekuawelaHawaii Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Territory v. KealohaHawaii Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API