Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Stiffler

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1990No. 17846Published

1Concurrence

McDEVITT, Justice,

specially concurring:

I am writing to concur in the majority view that there is no mistake of fact defense to the crime of statutory rape relating to the age of the complainant. There is, however, another predicate upon which to arrive at this result which should be aired.

There is a principle fundamental to our system of criminal law that the intent to commit a crime is a prerequisite to a finding of guilt and imposition of punishment. This principle “is as universal and persistent in mature systems of law as belief in freedom of the human will and a consequent ability and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. People v. CashMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Heath v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API