Amboy, Lansing & Traverse Bay Railroad v. Byerly
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Shiawassee Circuit. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley J.:
This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the defendants in error, who are bankers, to recover the amount of a certain promissory note, and also a sum claimed to be. due on an overdrawn 'bank account. The cause was referred, in the Court below, to H. M. Newcomb, Esq., as referee, who reported as follows:
“The undersig’ned referee, appointed by a rule of this Court made in the above cause, having heard and examined the matters in controversy in said cause, and having examined on oath the several witnesses produced therein, finds the following facts, to wit:
“1st. That from April 1st…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Trudo v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BrettMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Peck v. City National Bank of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Nichols v. Board of CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
- Kelley & Lysle Milling Co. v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Weirich v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.