Legal Opinion

State v. Griffith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon and appealed from the resultant judgment of imprisonment.

Defendant’s sole ground of appeal is that he was inadequately represented by counsel, thus depriving him of a fair trial and due process under § 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Hnited States Constitution. He purported to set out by affidavit the respects in which counsel was inadequate. The affidavit is as follows:

“1. I am the defendant herein and make this *522affidavit in support of my motion for a new trial and other relief.
“2. On my trial my appointed counsel failed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benson v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API