Legal Opinion
Wells v. Crosson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly applied section 224 of the Judiciary Law and section 983 of the Tax Law in calculating plaintiff’s damages. Interest on the damage award, however, should have been calculated from the date that liability was established (see, Rohring v City of Niagara Falls, 84 NY2d 60, 68; Love v State of New York, 78 NY2d 540, 544-545). Thus, we modify the order and judgment by directing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Love v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rahmey v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Rohring v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colangelo v. ColangeloNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- Measom v. Greenwich & Perry Street Housing Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2002
- Carroll Air Services, Inc. v. Northland AviationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Reagan v. MilonasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999