Legal Opinion
Putnam v. Ickes
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 6, 1935No. 6376-6383PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
The above appellants, petitioners in the court below, each filed an application for a homestead entry within the bounds of a tract of land located in the state of California. The lands referred to are known as Santa Ana Ranch or grant, containing approximately 62,516.57 acres, all of which is alleged to be public domain of the United States. This land was acquired as a Spanish grant protected by the cession of California by Mexico to the United States for which a patent was issued December 21, 1883, to one Bernardo Yorba and others. There was included in this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Southern Pac. Co. v. McAdooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Gully v. Interstate Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Marshall v. CrottyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.