Legal Opinion
Hiramanek v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided November 28, 2011No. Docket No. 14912-10UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KAMAL A. HIRAMANEK, Petitioner, AND ADIL HIRAMANEK, Intervenor v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Hiramanek v. Comm'r
Docket No. 14912-10
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2011-280; 2011 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 272; 102 T.C.M. (CCH) 546;
November 28, 2011, Filed
Decision will be entered for petitioner.
Steven L. Walker, for petitioner.
Adil Hiramanek, Pro se.
Audra M. Dineen, for respondent.
HAINES, Judge.
HAINES
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
HAINES, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner and intervenor's Federal income tax of $27,222 and an accuracy-related penalty of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Life Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- McGowan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
- Brown v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
- Lantz v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
- Lantz v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Levi v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016