Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 1, 1992No. 92-586Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks rehearing of this court’s per curiam affirmance without written decision, in which we affirmed the trial court’s order on restitution. On appeal, appellant contended the trial court erred in ordering restitution without inquiring into his ability to pay, and in requiring appellant to comply with a payment schedule to be developed by his probation officer. As grounds for rehearing, appellant maintains the court’s per curiam affirmance makes no sense, in light of the parties’ agreement that the trial court ordered appellant to comply…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ballance v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Bowers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API