Legal Opinion

Jones v. 170 East 92nd Street Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 2010PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No appeal lies from the portion of the order on appeal that denied reargument (CPLR 2221; Stratakis v Ryjov, 66 AD3d 411 [2009]). With respect to renewal, the only purportedly new evidence submitted by plaintiffs was a doctor’s affidavit responsive to the portion of the motion court’s prior order stating that defendants’ medical evidence was unrefuted, and opining that the mold in plaintiffs’ apartment had contributed to the sinusitis and respiratory problems for which he was treating one of the two plaintiffs. Putting aside that this affidavit was inadvertently omitted from plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tomaino v. 209 East 84 Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Taub v. Art Students LeagueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Menkes v. DelikatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Colletti v. SchiffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Musey v. 425 East 86 Apartments Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Meissner v. YunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Colletti v. SchiffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API