Legal Opinion

Lane v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

This case involves the points decided in McGregor v. The State, at this term {ante, p. 9), and one other in addition. This latter is all that will be now examined.

The Court, on the trial of the defendant for passing a counterfeit gold piece, permitted proof, with a view to the scienter of the fact that the defendant had in his possession, and attempted to secrete, counterfeit bank notes.

This evidence is objected to on two grounds. 1. Irrelevancy. 2. Because the bills were not produced, or notice given to produce them. We incline to think the evidence was relevant, but do not decide the point.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCartney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Wilson v. State ex rel. LashleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Creighton v. HoppisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Blasingame v. BlasingameIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. McConnell v. HannahIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Kingan & Co. v. OssamIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Boone County Bank v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API