Legal Opinion

United States v. Horace Edward Hollis

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 29, 1977No. 76-2514PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

In this case, the appellant, Horace Hollis, raised the issue of his mental competency at arraignment, but no hearing was held to evaluate that claim. He then pleaded guilty. After being incarcerated, Hollis filed a petition for habeas corpus, claiming he was incompetent at the time of his plea, and therefore should be permitted to withdraw it. At the habeas hearing, the trial judge placed on petitioner the burden of proving incompetency at the time of the guilty plea, and denied relief. On this appeal, the question is whether the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Renchenski v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Jon S. Miller, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Francisco J. Parra-IbanezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. State v. PruittOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. Ronald PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API