Legal Opinion

Jobst v. Butler Well Servicing, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1962No. 42,824, 42,825, 42,826, 42,827PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

Under a stipulation of the parties, approved by this court, the above cases, which are actions to recover for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision, were consolidated for purposes of appeal. It was further stipulated that only the case of Theodore Eugene Jobst, No. 42,824, be abstracted and briefed, and that the decision in such case would control and be considered as the decision in the other three cases.

The appeal is by two of the defendants from an order striking certain portions of their amended answer.

The question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Metzinger v. SuberaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Parnell v. Security Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Meng v. PennerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Smith v. City Ice & Delivery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Brock, Administrator v. PEABODY COOPERATIVE EQUITY EXCHSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. DeemySupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Holle v. LakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Campbell v. SchwartzMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API