City of Roanoke v. Holt
Roanoke County Circuit Court
1Opinion of the Court
BY JUDGE CLIFFORD R. WECKSTEIN
Paul Matthews Holt, III, the defendant, has been indicted for violation of a Roanoke city ordinance. He challenges the validity of that ordinance. Here, in summary, is his major argument:
1. He is charged with violating a local ordinance which forbids negotiating for a commercial act of sodomy.
2. A state statute also forbids negotiating for a commercial act of sodomy.
3. Under Virginia Code § 1-13.17, localities may not enact ordinances which are inconsistent with state statutes.
4. The local ordinance explicitly places a lesser burden of proof on the prosecution…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Richmond v. Confrere Club of Richmond, Virginia, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- King v. County of ArlingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Hanbury v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Board of Sup'rs of Loudoun County v. PumphreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- McFadden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.