Legal Opinion

City of Roanoke v. Holt

Roanoke County Circuit Court

Decided March 22, 1993No. Case No. CR92-1655Published

1Opinion of the Court

BY JUDGE CLIFFORD R. WECKSTEIN

Paul Matthews Holt, III, the defendant, has been indicted for violation of a Roanoke city ordinance. He challenges the validity of that ordinance. Here, in summary, is his major argument:

1. He is charged with violating a local ordinance which forbids negotiating for a commercial act of sodomy.

2. A state statute also forbids negotiating for a commercial act of sodomy.

3. Under Virginia Code § 1-13.17, localities may not enact ordinances which are inconsistent with state statutes.

4. The local ordinance explicitly places a lesser burden of proof on the prosecution…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Richmond v. Confrere Club of Richmond, Virginia, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. King v. County of ArlingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Hanbury v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  4. Board of Sup'rs of Loudoun County v. PumphreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  5. McFadden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API