Jose A. Sagastume v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.
Jose A. Sagastume (appellant) was convicted in a jury trial of statutory burglary, attempted rape, abduction with intent to defile, and two counts of grand larceny. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to strike one of the grand larceny convictions as required by the “single larceny rule.” Finding no error, we affirm.
I
“On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth and grant to it all reasonable inferences therefrom.” Barlow v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 421, 428-29, 494 S.E.2d 901, 904 (1998). “The jury’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- West v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Barlow v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Richardson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Alexander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alexander J. Dennos, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- Jerneil Leslie Moody v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
- Kenneth Joseph Gibson v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014