Legal Opinion

Hamilos v. Hamilos

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 6, 1982No. 1701, September Term, 1981. No. 9, September Term, 1982PublishedCited by 11 opinions

September Term, 1982.]

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.

FORWARD

Those who opine that "there is nothing new under the sun” evidence that they have spent little, if any, time in a courtroom. The tribunals of this land frequently experience something new and different. These two appeals are illustrative of the point.

The primary thrust of the suits out of which these appeals grow is to vitiate the underlying separation agreement upon which a divorce a vinculo matrimonii was granted while simultaneously allowing the decree of divorce itself to remain valid. Such a legal maneuver is akin to demolishing a structure’s foundation and having the building it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Beltway Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Goldberg v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Grossman v. GrossmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Miles v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Ashe v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnston v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Toni v. ToniNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hamilos v. HamilosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Preissman v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Home Indemnity Co. v. KillianCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API