Imperial Mach. Co. v. N. R. Streeter & Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by the Imperial ’Machine Company against N. R. Streeter & Company. On renewed motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
[1] The original motion for preliminary injunction in this case was denied but without prejudice to renew, and this renewal of the motion is based on additional affidavits in answer to the affidavit of defendant’s expert witness Shoemaker, who substantially testified that the highest part of the elevation or cutting surface in the Lehman patent, which defendant claims anticipates the patent in suit, was in the middle, and that the sides sloped away therefrom forming a rounded agitator. Such description of the patent, in view of the fact that no expert for the defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kansas City Hay-Press Co. v. DevolCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
3Cited by20 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.