Ex Parte Allen
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1DissentWhitham, J.
I respectfully dissent. I agree that the evidence is sufficient; however, I would sustain appellant’s fourth and fifth grounds of error and reverse and remand. Before addressing the reasons why I would reverse and remand, I must express my disagreement with certain of the majority’s holdings pertaining to the magistrate practice.
The majority’s first erroneous holding
I cannot agree with the majority’s holding that “we see no reason why [appellant] may not waive a hearing before the district judge and consent to determination of the *890matter by a magistrate.” The waiver reads:
NOW COMES, William…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Ex Parte ScarbroughCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Mengel Box Co. v. FowlkesTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Kelley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- Vaughn v. SpitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984