Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Allen

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 30, 1985No. 05-85-00180-CRPublished

1DissentWhitham, J.

I respectfully dissent. I agree that the evidence is sufficient; however, I would sustain appellant’s fourth and fifth grounds of error and reverse and remand. Before addressing the reasons why I would reverse and remand, I must express my disagreement with certain of the majority’s holdings pertaining to the magistrate practice.

The majority’s first erroneous holding

I cannot agree with the majority’s holding that “we see no reason why [appellant] may not waive a hearing before the district judge and consent to determination of the *890matter by a magistrate.” The waiver reads:

NOW COMES, William…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Ex Parte ScarbroughCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Mengel Box Co. v. FowlkesTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Kelley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  5. Vaughn v. SpitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API