Legal Opinion

Duquesne Light Co. v. GURICK.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 1979No. Appeal, 2464 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DiSalle,

Duquesne Light Company (Petitioner) seeks a reversal of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) granting compensation to Catherine Gurick (Claimant) for the death of Mick Gurick, her husband. To this end, Petitioner assigns three allegations of error: (1) that the medical testimony failed to establish that Nick Gurick’s death resulted from occupational disease; (2) that Claimant’s dependency on he??husband was never established; and, (3) that Petitioner did not receive timely notice of Nick Gurick’s death.

Relying on our recent decision in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Consolidation Coal Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Leipziger v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Walker v. HEAVEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Elliott v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Novak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. McCloskey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API