Legal Opinion

Flagg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 12, 1913No. 2272PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The statment of facts shows to have been signed only by counsel for the appellant and is not approved by the judge. The evidence, therefore, can not be considered.

There is one bill of exceptions in the record which recites that the case is one of circumstantial evidence and the court, in charging upon this, gave the usual stereotyped charge, but nowhere told the jury the ease at bar was one upon which the State relied upon circumstantial evidence for a conviction. So far as this phase of the case is .concerned, we are of the opinion that this was not error. While it…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shaddix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Fox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API