Legal Opinion

United States of America and Bruce B. MacK Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Stanley M. Weingarden

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1973No. 72-1233PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEICK, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court denying a petition for the enforcement of summons and to quash the summons which had been issued by Internal Revenue Agent Mack under authority of Section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 7602. The District Court, after several hearings, handed down an opinion in which it held that the summons was issued for an impermissible purpose, namely, for the sole purpose of gathering data for a criminal prosecution. 1

The facts are not controverted. Only one witness, namely Agent Bruce Mack of the Auditing…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Marjorie Glasson v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. K & M Joint Venture v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. Taylor and Gaskin, Inc. v. Chris-Craft IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API