Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thomas A. McElwee & Son, Inc. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 2006Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Based on the facts as found by the trial court, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that Thomas A. McElwee & Son, Inc. (Property Owner) established that they were denied sufficient access to its property necessary to establish a temporary de facto taking had occurred. I dissent because in reversing the trial court, the majority applies the incorrect legal standard as enunciated by our Supreme Court, and even applying that incorrect legal standard, a de facto taking was not proven based on the factual findings made by the trial court.

Southeas…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Truck Terminal Realty Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Langley Shopping Center, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Iron City Automobile Co. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Rubano v. Department of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
  5. Elser v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API