Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 27, 1981No. 80-1919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

Although loans for educational purposes on attractive terms are easily obtainable and often irresistible, repayment may be difficult and inconvenient. It is the inconvenience that is the genesis of this litigation. Plaintiffs, individual low-income residents of western Pennsylvania who had obtained loans guaranteed by the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (“PHEAA” or “Agency”), sought to enjoin PHEAA from suing them in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, on the loans in default. They contend that by bringing suit in a forum as much as 200…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Pearline E. Freeman v. B & B AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Warren J. BellardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Howard L. Terry and W. H. Hunt v. The Penn Central Corporation and Colt Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API