Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thurmond

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1979No. 650PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant, Brenda Thurmond, contends that the trial court imposed an excessively harsh sentence of imprisonment of 3 to 23 months and a fine of $500.00 while her codefendant, on the same charges, received a sentence of 2 years probation and a fine of $2,000.00. Appellant argues that the court’s belief that she had lied while testifying and her codefendant’s medical condition could not justify the disparity in sentences. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of sentence.

On October 10, 1975, a jury convicted appellant and her brother, Jay Thurmond, of 2 counts each of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Wiegand v. WiegandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. KostkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. CooperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. JamesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API