Legal Opinion

McDuffie v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1894PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Lane, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment on the trial in the court below for injuries which he claims to have received by reason of defendant’s negligence..

The record shows that on December 28, 1891, in driving across the railroad track of defendant with a team attached to a lumber wagon, plaintiff was struck by an engine, causing the injury complained of. The negligence alleged in the declaration is that defendant was running a wild engine 'over its road at a dangerous and reckless rate of speed, .and passed this' crossing without giving the signals required by the statute; that cars were left standing…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Lambert v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hudson v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Lonis v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Ommen v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API