Legal Opinion
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. v. Manny's Porshop, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 12, 1997No. 96 C 5924PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONLON, District Judge.
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (“Porsche NA”) and Dr. Ing. h.c.F. Porsche AG (“Porsche AG”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) sue Manny’s Porshop (“Manny’s”) and Emmanuel Shoshoo (“Shoshoo”) (collectively “defendants”) for trademark infringement (Count I), false designation of origin (Count II), and trademark dilution (Count III) under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125(a), 1125(c). Plaintiffs also sue for common law trademark infringement (Count VI), breach of contract (Count VII), and violations of the Illinois Anti-Dilution Act, 765 ILCS…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc., and Textiles Y Confecciones Europeas, S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Company, Defendant-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Stephen N. Roth, M.D. v. Lutheran General Hospital, Jerome Kraut, M.D., Seymour Metrick, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Door Systems, Incorporated v. Pro-Line Door Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Mil-Mar Shoe Company, Incorporated v. Shonac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Liquid Glass Enterprises, Inc. v. Dr. Ing. H.C.F. Porsche AGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Audi AG v. D'AMATODistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- PepsiCo, Inc. v. ReyesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
- American Honda Motor Co. v. Pro-Line ProtoformDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Volkswagen AG v. Dorling Kindersley Publishing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.