Legal Opinion

McGreevy v. McGreevy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: A motion by plaintiff for summary judgment may not be granted unless the action comes within one of the first eight subdivisions of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and only in such equitable actions as fall within subdivisions six, seven, and eight thereof (Lederer v. Wise Shoe Co., 276 N. Y. 459, 463; Donnelly v. National City Bank of New York, 276 App. Div. 1096; Tripp, Guide *706to Motion Practice [Rev. ed.], § 96; Shientag on Summary Judgment.) In this action for a declaratory judgment the nature of the relief sought is not included within any of the said subdivisions.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lederer v. Wise Shoe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bradford v. PetteNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Elgar v. S. H. Kress & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API