Minnesota Valley Railroad v. Doran
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This cause was before this court at the January term, 1870, (15 Minn. 230,) and a new trial was then granted. The second trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and it appeals from the order denying the same to this court.
Read the full summary
This cause was before this court at the January term, 1870, (15 Minn. 230,) and a new trial was then granted. The second trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and it appeals from the order denying the same to this court. The case as presented on the former appeal is fully stated in vol. 15 -, the other material matters relative to the questions raised on the second appeal appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Ripley, Oh. J.
This is the case in which a new trial was heretofore ordered (15 Minn. 230.) The appeal taken by Doran from the award of the commissioners, was upon the ground, that the award of said commissioners, is a wholly inadequate-compensation for the taking of said several parcels of land.
*191The said appeal coming on for trial at the October term, 1370, of the district court for Le Sueur county, and a jury empannelled to try the issue raised on said appeal, having viewed the premises, the railroad company offered to proceed and introduce evidence in support of the issue made…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Minnesota Valley R. R. v. DoranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
3Cited by14 opinions
- B. & O. Railroad v. P. W. & Ky. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Lamm v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Headley v. City of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Bowers v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.