Legal Opinion

American Rural Cellular, Inc. v. Systems Communication Corp.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 21, 1995No. 930415-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge.

American Rural Cellular, Inc. (Cellcom) appeals the trial court’s determination that Systems Communication Corporation (Sys-com) was not prohibited from maintaining construction-related actions. We remand.

FACTS

In 1990, Cellcom and Syscom entered into an agreement for the construction and management of a cellular telephone system to serve eastern Utah. As the system neared completion, Cellcom questioned Syscom’s performance under the contract. Syscom responded by filing mechanics’ liens on the three Cellcom properties that Syscom had improved. Cellcom brought suit,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lignell v. BergUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sprague v. Boyles Bros. Drilling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Kinkella v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Betenson v. Call Auto & Equipment Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bill Nay & Sons Excavating v. Neeley Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Rural Cellular, Inc. v. System Communication Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  2. A.K. & R. Whipple Plumbing & Heating v. Aspen ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  3. R4 Constructors v. Inbalance YogaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. State v. BohneCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  5. State v. BohneCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API