Legal Opinion

Floyd v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 24, 1956PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

90 So.2d 105 (1956)

John Paul FLOYD, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

October 24, 1956.

Rehearing Denied December 3, 1956.

Carr & O'Quin and Paul L.E. Helliwell, Miami, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

O'CONNELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the appellant, defendant below, John Paul Floyd, rendered by the Criminal Court of Record, Dade County, in a trial without jury. Defendant was charged with a crime under the provisions of Section 800.01, F.S.A.

Defendant contends…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  2. People v. MeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. E. E. Alley Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. State v. RankinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kearse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Pangburn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  5. Blair v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API