Legal Opinion

Kucera v. Pellan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1937No. 29978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

The plaintiff, Inez M. Kucera, brought action to foreclose a mortgage upon a Butler county farm, and a decree was entered, finding the amount due on said mortgage to be $12,136, with interest at 8 per cent., and directing that the premises be sold, as provided therein. A motion for new trial was overruled, and defendant Cyril Pellan appealed, and charges that the court erred in refusing to allow him recoupment on his cross-petition for damages caused by the alleged false representations of August A. Hayek concerning the value, quality, and character of the farm.

The answer and cross-petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BeckerNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McKibbin v. DayNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Musgrove v. EskilsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Realty Investment Co. v. ShaferNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Wustrack v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lucky 7, LLC v. Tht Realty, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lee v. BrodbeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API