Legal Opinion

Blaine v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1980No. WD 31158PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOMERVILLE, Judge.

Movant has appealed from the denial of post-conviction relief sought via a second or successive Rule 27.26 motion.

In September, 1974, movant was found guilty by a jury on two counts of first degree robbery and two consecutive twenty-five year sentences were imposed. A direct appeal therefrom was unsuccessful. State v. Blaine, 528 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1975). Movant was equally unsuccessful in obtaining post-conviction relief by means of a Rule 27.26 motion filed in May of 1976, denied in June of 1976, and from which no appeal was taken.

Movant’s second or successive Rule 27.26…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Careaga v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Agee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Oatsvall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Warren v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Bufalo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Morgan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API