Legal Opinion
Caywood v. Caywood
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 1975No. 48915PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
In a divorce action by pretrial order, the trial judge refused to automatically award wife all property under 12 O.S.1971, § 1278 as amended (12 O.S.Supp.1975, § 1278) to be tried on its merits after effective date of amending act, October 1, 1975. Trial judge certified an immediate appeal of his order based on an interpretation of language contained in the amending act reading, “When a divorce shall be granted the wife shall be restored * * * also to all the property land, tenements, heredita-ments owned by either party before marriage or acquired by either party in their…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Sanditen v. SanditenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Excise Board, Washita County v. LowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Oklahoma City v. PrietoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Ex Parte MastersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Griggs v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Kratz v. KratzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Acker v. AckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Kratz v. KratzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Opinion No., Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1983