Chapman v. Chase Nat. Bank

This case was before us at the March, 1935, term, and the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded he- cause we were of the opinion that the peremptory charge should not have been given. See Chase National Bank v. Chapman, 173 Miss. 333, 160 So. 286. Upon remand the case was submitted to a jury, and their verdict was in favor of the bank.

On the second trial, the original transcript of the proof was, by agreement, read to the jury, and the only additional evidence offered was in behalf of appellant, which showed that for the year 1917 the wife leased the plantation property to her husband…