Bagley v. City of Alma
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Judge.
This is an appeal by a condemnee from the judgment entered in his appeal from the award of the special master.
1. Appellee introduced into evidence a map designated “FIA FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP.” It was admitted over appellant’s objection that the map had not been properly authenticated.
While proper authentication of a map is the preferred route for admission of the map into evidence (see Parker v. Smith, 66 Ga. App. 567 (2) (18 SE2d 559) (1942)), unauthenticated maps may be admitted by stipulation or agreement or, in the absence of such agreement, may be admitted for a limited…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- White v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- DeKalb County v. Trustees, Decatur Lodge No. 1602Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Bunger v. GrimmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Riddle v. BekerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Beckett v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Bulgin v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008